k8rn

My self-hosted Talos Kubernetes cluster running on Tailscale, configured using terraform and flux

Stars
1
Committers
2

k8rn

This holds everything for my bare metal Talos k8s cluster.

The cluster is initialized with Terraform, including flux, which then runs off of this repo.

Setup

This configuration depends on:

  • Tailscale
  • Cloudflare
    • A DNS zone to assign a subdomain in
  • A KMS service for talos, I'm using talos-unlockr to easily unlock things on demand.
  • SSH key for flux
    • Must be a deploy key for this repo
  • Age key for SOPS-encrypted data with flux

The cluster nodes have to be assigned IPs reachable from your machine.

Install

Talos images

Each image:

  • gets a UUID in the META partition because the mini PCs I have don't have proper UUIDs generated
  • has stable_secret set as a kernel param

Creating the image factory config and fetching each image is handled in Terraform and exposed as outputs. The justfile makes it easy to grab the update image and the ISOs.

Each node is added to the Terraform variable nodes before it's added to either control_plane_nodes or worker_nodes.

DNS

This Terraform uses Cloudflare to assign a public DNS name to load balance between the Tailscale IPs.

Another option would be to run a something like coredns-tailscale to handle this.

This has two problems:

Tailscale

This terraform can use IPv6 addresses, which Tailscale provisions dynamically.

Depending on which DNS you're using, note that there might be a large delay between when the nodes start querying the API endpoint /we try to contact the API endpoint and when the DNS records are propagated.

Somewhat out of scope but for ease of use I also assign IPv4 Tailscale addresses statically. Assuming cluster_name = "k8rn", this can be achieved via ACLs:

    "nodeAttrs": [
        {
            "target": ["tag:k8rn-cp-0"],
            "ipPool": ["100.64.1.10/32"],
        },
        {
            "target": ["tag:k8rn-cp-1"],
            "ipPool": ["100.64.1.11/32"],
        },
        {
            "target": ["tag:k8rn-cp-2"],
            "ipPool": ["100.64.1.12/32"],
        },
    ],

Each node is assigned tag:<node hostname> which Tailscale then uses to assign an IP pool, in this case a pool of size one.

Kubernetes

Cilium

Cilium is set up with native routing. This is a bit tricky with Tailscale because each node needs to advertise routes for its podCIDRs but we can't directly put this in the ExtensionServiceConfig since it isn't known when we initialize the extension.

Instead, two extra init containers run with the cilium agent. The first retrieves the node's podCIDRs and the second calls tailscale set --advertise-routes with those podCIDRs. The Tailscale extension is configured with --accept-routes and --snat-subnet-routes=false, since we don't want or need to SNAT between Pods on different nodes.

Ideally this functionality would be upstreamed but for now, this just works.

This requires some ACLs set up in Tailscale:

{
    "ipsets": {
        "ipset:k8rn-pods": [
            "add 10.244.0.0/16",
        ],
    },
    "autoApprovers": {
        "routes": {
            "10.244.0.0/16": [ // can't use ipset here
                "tag:k8rn-node",
            ],
        },
    },
    "acls": {
        ...
        // k8rn: nodes and pods can reach each other
        {
            "action": "accept",
            "src":    ["tag:k8rn-node", "ipset:k8rn-pods"],
            "dst": [
                "tag:k8rn-node:*",
                "ipset:k8rn-pods:*",
            ],
        },
    },
}

Intel GPU plugin

My nodes are Beelink EQ12s, their N100 CPU is a 12th generation Intel, so it has Intel Quick Sync Video support for hardware acceleration with Jellyfin.

This repo uses Intel's GPU plugin to make everything available to the Jellyfin Pods.

Envoy gateway

k8rn is running Envoy gateway with a relatively complicated architecture.

Ideally we'd use the Tailscale operator to expose the gateway as a LoadBalancer Service and the Gateway would get its own Tailscale machine. However due to tailscale/tailscale#12393 this is currently infeasible.

Instead we rely on the nodes being Tailscale machines:

  • Set net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start=0 on the nodes so we can listen on 443 without root
  • The Envoy gateway Pods run with hostNetwork: true
  • Set useListenerPortAsContainerPort: true so the container really listens on 443
  • An EnvoyPatchPolicy modifies the listener to bind only to tailscale0 with SO_BINDTODEVICE
  • The Service is configured as NodePort so that external-dns creates A/AAAA records pointing to each of the node IPs.
    • Note this depends on clients failing over between DNS records because only one of the nodes will
      have Envoy gateway running. But this seems to work from my testing
    • Otherwise Envoy can be deployed as a DaemonSet

External services

Some services are running on a different server in the tailnet and a Service with a manually managed EndpointSlice handles forwarding the traffic.